Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: Rand Paul | Clear Filter
Summary:Certain Republican Senators, including Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young, are criticized for voting with Democrats in an attempt to limit the President's powers to defend the United States, thereby harming American self-defense and national security. The War Powers Act is described as unconstitutional, a determination made by all past Presidents and their Departments of Justice. A significant Senate vote on this topic is anticipated next week.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Certain Republican Senators voted with Democrats to reduce the President's powers to defend the United States.
- The mentioned Senators should not be re-elected to office.
- The vote significantly hampers American self-defense and national security.
- The vote impedes the President’s authority as Commander in Chief.
- The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, violating Article II of the Constitution.
- All Presidents and their Departments of Justice prior to the current administration determined the War Powers Act to be unconstitutional.
- A more important Senate vote on the War Powers Act is scheduled for next week.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:3/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:Rand Paul is reaching out to an unspecified individual, implied to be Donald Trump, to partner on passing legislation for Association Health Plans, which would allow individuals to collectively buy health insurance through retailers like Costco, Amazon, or Sam's Club, aiming to lower premiums. This initiative was previously blocked in court by Democratic Attorney Generals.
Sentiment:Policy-focused
Key Claims:
- Rand Paul and the message recipient have had recent disagreements.
- The recipient signed an executive order in their first term to legalize Association Health Plans.
- Association Health Plans enable individuals to purchase health insurance collectively via major retailers.
- This collaboration promised to lower insurance premiums.
- The previous effort failed due to legal challenges from Democratic Attorney Generals.
- The policy can be passed in Congress today with the recipient's assistance.
- Passing this policy requires only a change in labor law and costs nothing.
- Rand Paul is seeking a partnership with the recipient on this legislative effort.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post criticizes Senators Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, asserting they have become disloyal to the Republican Party, MAGA, and America First principles despite the speaker's claimed role in their elections, and highlights the speaker's own electoral success in Kentucky.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Rand Paul's performance has significantly declined.
- The speaker was responsible for Rand Paul's election twice.
- Rand Paul consistently fails to vote positively for the Republican Party.
- Rand Paul is characterized as a 'nasty liddle’ guy'.
- Thomas Massie is similar to Rand Paul, being referred to as 'Rand Paul Jr.'.
- Thomas Massie is described as a 'sick Wacko'.
- Thomas Massie refuses to support the Republican Party, MAGA, or America First with his votes.
- The speaker secured three landslide victories in Kentucky.
- The described voting behavior of Rand Paul and Thomas Massie is unusual.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post asserts the Republican Party's current high level of unity and significant growth in membership, despite specific individuals and internal disagreements regarding the filibuster. It attributes a strong border, substantial tax cuts, a thriving economy, and record-high stock market performance to a Republican administration. The post concludes by projecting continued success and urging a vote for Republicans.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- The Republican Party has never been so united as it is currently.
- The Republican Party is much larger now than in 2015, with millions more members.
- There is internal disagreement within the Republican Party regarding the termination of the filibuster.
- Democrats would terminate the filibuster at their first opportunity.
- A Republican administration achieved the strongest border ever.
- A Republican administration enacted the biggest tax cuts.
- A Republican administration presided over the best economy.
- A Republican administration saw the highest stock market in USA history.
- The best is yet to come under Republican leadership.
- Voters should support Republicans.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:Senator John Kennedy introduced a bill to withhold pay from Members of Congress, which Senator Rand Paul opposed, seeking payment for members, a stance interpreted as supporting individuals who prevented the government from functioning, leading to an inquiry about Rand Paul's motivations.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Senator John Kennedy introduced a Bill to withhold Members of Congress from getting paid.
- Senator Rand Paul tried to stop the Bill.
- Rand Paul never votes for anything.
- Rand Paul wanted to be paid.
- Rand Paul wanted to pay the people who stopped Government from working.
- The author expresses confusion about Rand Paul's actions.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post expresses strong disapproval of Senators Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, asserting that they do not vote positively for the Republican Party, MAGA, or America First, despite Donald Trump's perceived role in their electoral success and his own significant support in Kentucky.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Rand Paul's political performance has significantly declined.
- Donald Trump was instrumental in Rand Paul's two election victories.
- Rand Paul consistently votes against the Republican Party's interests.
- Rand Paul is characterized as a 'nasty liddle' guy.'
- Thomas Massie is compared to Rand Paul, labeled 'Rand Paul Jr.,' and called a 'sick Wacko.'
- Thomas Massie refuses to align his votes with the Republican Party, MAGA, or America First.
- Donald Trump won Kentucky three times with massive electoral landslides.
- The voting behavior of Rand Paul and Thomas Massie is deemed 'really weird.'
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post asserts that Thom Tillis harmed the people of North Carolina and failed to act on catastrophic flooding until the author's administration intervened, which resulted in a "miracle" of help. It characterizes Tillis as ineffective and unfavorably compares him to Rand "Fauci" Paul.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Thom Tillis has hurt the people of North Carolina.
- Nothing was done to help North Carolina with catastrophic flooding until the author took office.
- A "miracle" of help occurred for North Carolina regarding flooding after the author took office.
- Thom Tillis is a "talker and complainer," not a "doer."
- Thom Tillis is worse than Rand "Fauci" Paul.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post questions Senator Rand Paul's vote against an unspecified measure and expresses disapproval of his actions.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Rand Paul voted 'NO' tonight
- Rand Paul's vote indicates a problem with him
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post describes a situation where Senator Rand Paul departed from his political party's position regarding border security funding, leading to his party subsequently distancing itself from his stance.
Sentiment:Political Observation
Key Claims:
- Rand Paul disagreed with his political party on border security funding.
- Rand Paul's political party subsequently disagreed with him.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post extends an invitation to Senator Rand Paul and his family to a White House party, aiming to secure his vote for an important, unnamed piece of legislation described as crucial for 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Senator Rand Paul and his family are invited to a White House party.
- The invitation's purpose is to secure Rand Paul's vote for a 'Great, Big, Beautiful Bill'.
- Rand Paul is characterized as a 'toughest vote' in the U.S. Senate.
- The legislation is described as 'one of the greatest and most important pieces of legislation ever'.
- The bill aims to 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10