Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
- Not sending troops to Los Angeles prevented the city from burning.
- Los Angeles would have burned without Trump's specific action (or inaction).
- The Governor and Mayor are incompetent regarding fire-related permitting.
- Federal permitting for fire-damaged houses is virtually complete.
- City and State permitting for fire-damaged houses is disastrously bungled and behind schedule.
The post addresses localized domestic governance issues (Los Angeles permitting, hypothetical troop deployment) and does not contain new policy announcements, economic forecasts, or mentions of specific S&P 500 companies or sectors that would broadly affect the index.
The content is entirely focused on domestic governance and hypothetical past events within Los Angeles, with no implications for international relations, military actions abroad, or global stability.
- Commodities: The post has no direct or indirect relevance to global commodity markets. Oil (WTI) and Gold (XAU) prices are highly unlikely to be impacted, as there are no mentions of supply/demand shocks, geopolitical tensions, or broad economic uncertainty.
- Currencies (Forex): There is no likely effect on the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY). The post concerns localized domestic politics and does not present any information that would alter macroeconomic expectations or trigger a 'flight to safety' into the dollar. The dollar will not be treated as a safe-haven asset based on this post.
- Global Equities: There is no expected sentiment change for European (e.g., STOXX 600) or Asian (e.g., Nikkei) markets. The post's content is highly localized to US domestic politics and does not carry global economic or political implications that would influence international equity markets.
- Bonds (Fixed Income): A 'flight to safety' into U.S. Treasuries is not likely. The post does not describe an event that would be perceived as a systemic risk or a significant economic shock. Therefore, their yields are unlikely to be impacted meaningfully.