The Stable Genius Report

Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)

Buy Me A Coffee
Profile Picture View on Truth Social ↗ text
Summary:The post describes Elon Musk's recent decline, his interest in forming a third political party, and the author's critical view of such parties, contrasting them with the Republican party's legislative achievements, including the elimination of an Electric Vehicle mandate. It also reveals past interactions with Musk regarding his endorsement and a request for a NASA appointment.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
  • Elon Musk is experiencing a significant decline, described as 'going completely off the rails' and becoming a 'TRAIN WRECK' over the past five weeks.
  • Elon Musk intends to start a Third Political Party.
  • Third Political Parties have never succeeded in the United States because 'The System seems not designed for them'.
  • Third Political Parties cause 'Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS'.
  • The United States already has enough disruption and chaos from the 'Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds!'.
  • Republicans are a 'smooth running “machine”' and recently passed the 'biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country'.
  • The Republican-passed Bill eliminates the 'ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate'.
  • The EV Mandate would have 'forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time'.
  • The author has been strongly opposed to the EV Mandate 'from the very beginning'.
  • People are now permitted to purchase whatever type of vehicle they desire, including Gasoline Powered, Hybrids, or New Technologies.
  • The author campaigned on terminating the EV Mandate for two years.
  • Elon Musk provided his 'total and unquestioned Endorsement' to the author.
  • The author questioned Elon Musk during his endorsement about his awareness of the plan to terminate the EV Mandate, as it was in every speech and conversation.
  • Elon Musk responded that he had 'no problems' with the termination of the EV Mandate.
  • Elon Musk requested that one of his close friends run NASA.
  • Elon Musk's friend was a 'blue blooded Democrat' who had 'never contributed to a Republican before'.
  • It was considered inappropriate for a close friend of Elon Musk, who is involved in the Space Business, to run NASA given NASA's significant role in Elon Musk's corporate life.
  • The author's 'Number One charge is to protect the American Public!'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):3/10

The post details the elimination of an Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate through a 'Great Bill,' which could impact the automotive sector, particularly companies focused on EV production, and related industries. Criticism of Elon Musk, a prominent figure in several publicly traded companies, could also influence investor sentiment towards those entities.

Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10

The post focuses on internal political dynamics, individual criticism, and domestic policy discussions, with no explicit references to international conflicts, military actions, or foreign policy threats.

Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:2/10
  • Commodities: Minimal direct impact on broad commodity markets. Potential minor, long-term implications for oil demand if the preference for gasoline-powered vehicles over EVs is sustained, but negligible in the short-term.
  • Currencies (Forex): Very little direct impact on major currency pairs or the US Dollar Index (DXY) as the post focuses on specific domestic policy and individual commentary rather than broad economic or monetary policy shifts.
  • Global Equities: Direct impact primarily on Electric Vehicle (EV) manufacturers (e.g., Tesla) and their supply chains, potentially affecting investor sentiment towards these companies. May be seen as favorable for traditional automotive manufacturers. Broader market indices like the S&P 500 or Nasdaq are likely to see limited overall impact.
  • Fixed Income (Bonds): Unlikely to have a significant impact on US Treasury yields or credit spreads, as the policy discussed is sector-specific and does not imply a major shift in fiscal or monetary policy.
  • Volatility / Derivatives: Unlikely to trigger a broad market volatility spike (e.g., VIX). Options activity might see localized changes for specific automotive or technology companies mentioned.
  • Crypto / Digital Assets: No direct or clear indirect link to cryptocurrency or digital asset markets. Bitcoin's behavior as a risk-on asset or macro hedge is unlikely to be influenced by this post.
  • Cross-Asset Correlations and Systemic Risk: No signs of systemic risk or significant breakdown in normal cross-asset correlations are evident from the content of the post.
  • Retail Sentiment / Market Psychology: Could stir sentiment among retail investors regarding EV stocks or general political discourse, but it is unlikely to trigger broad meme stock phenomena or significant shifts in overall retail market psychology based solely on this post.
Show Original PostBy clicking, you agree to load content from Truth Social and share data (e.g. IP address) with them. See their privacy policy.

Note: On mobile devices, the embedded post may appear truncated. Use the scrollbar within the embed or click its "Show More" button to see the full content.