Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: 60 Minutes | Clear Filter
Summary:The author asserts that 60 Minutes has treated them significantly worse since a recent "takeover," contrary to some beliefs that the author is close with the new owners of CBS.
Sentiment:Disgruntled
Key Claims:
- Some people believe the author is close with the new owners of CBS.
- 60 Minutes has treated the author worse since the "takeover" than ever before.
- The author implies that the treatment by 60 Minutes indicates a lack of friendly relations with the new owners.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post criticizes Marjorie Taylor Greene, claiming her views changed because she was jilted by the President and labeling her 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA.' It also criticizes Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for an interview and past reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop, demanding an apology for 'incorrect and Libelous statements'.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Marjorie Taylor Greene (Marjorie “Traitor” Brown) went 'BAD' because she was 'JILTED by the President of the United States'.
- Marjorie Taylor Greene's ideas are now 'really BAD' and she is 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA'.
- Lesley Stahl 'attacked' the President on a past show and 'still owes' an apology.
- Lesley Stahl incorrectly stated that Hunter Biden’s 'LAPTOP FROM HELL was produced by Russia'.
- The new ownership of 60 Minutes, Paramount, is no better than the old ownership and allows bad shows to air.
- The old ownership of 60 Minutes paid the President millions for 'FAKE REPORTING'.
- 60 Minutes has gotten 'WORSE' since Paramount bought it.
- The President demands a complete and total apology from Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for 'incorrect and Libelous statements about Hunter’s Laptop'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:An announcement stating that a recent 60 Minutes interview featuring Donald J. Trump, broadcast on CBS on Sunday night, achieved the highest ratings for the program in years.
Sentiment:Triumphant
Key Claims:
- A 60 Minutes interview of Donald J. Trump aired on CBS.
- The interview was broadcast on a Sunday night.
- The interview garnered the highest ratings for 60 Minutes in years.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post expresses strong disapproval of the NFL’s new kickoff rule, stating it detracts from the game's pageantry and glamour and does not enhance safety. It advocates for reverting to the old rule and hopes college football avoids similar changes. The author then anticipates watching an interview featuring himself on 60 Minutes.
Sentiment:Opinionated and Self-Promotional
Key Claims:
- The NFL’s new kickoff rule is ridiculous.
- The new kickoff rule removes pageantry and glamour from the game.
- The new kickoff rule does nothing for safety.
- The NFL should change back to its old kickoff rule.
- College football should not adopt the new kickoff rule.
- The author is preparing to watch himself on 60 Minutes.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The author announces an upcoming interview on 60 Minutes following the Kansas City / Buffalo NFL Football Game and expresses a desire to receive treatment comparable to that given to Kamala.
Sentiment:Challenging
Key Claims:
- The author will be interviewed on 60 Minutes.
- The interview will occur after the Kansas City / Buffalo NFL Football Game.
- The author desires equitable treatment from 60 Minutes compared to Kamala's previous interview.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:An interview with 60 Minutes is scheduled for tomorrow night.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Donald Trump will be interviewed on 60 Minutes tomorrow night
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:A $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit has been brought against The New York Times, which is characterized as a degenerate newspaper and a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democrat Party. The post asserts that The New York Times has engaged in decades of lying about the former President, his family, business, and the America First movement, and that its front-page endorsement of Kamala Harris was an illegal campaign contribution. The action builds on past successful litigation against other media entities, alleging a malicious pattern of document and visual alteration for smearing.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit is being brought against The New York Times.
- The New York Times is described as degenerate and a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democrat Party.
- The New York Times' endorsement of Kamala Harris on its front page is an unprecedented and illegal campaign contribution.
- The New York Times has engaged in a decades-long method of lying about Donald Trump, his family, business, and political movements.
- The New York Times is accused of a malicious form of defamation through a highly sophisticated system of document and visual alteration.
- Past successful litigation against George Stephanopoulos/ABC/Disney and 60 Minutes/CBS/Paramount for similar actions resulted in record settlements.
- The long-term intent and pattern of abuse by media entities is unacceptable and illegal.
- The lawsuit is being brought in Florida.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:A significant legal victory was achieved against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount, resulting in a multi-million dollar settlement. This is presented as part of a series of successes against media entities accused of widespread fraud and deceit, placing other major news outlets on notice.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A major legal victory was secured against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount.
- The settlement includes $16 million in direct payment and an anticipated $20 million more in advertising or programming, totaling over $36 million.
- CBS and its corporate owners, similar to ABC and George Slopadopoulos, were aware they had defrauded the American people and were eager to settle.
- This win is part of a continuing series of victories over the 'Fake News Media'.
- All major mainstream media outlets are now on notice that their ability to deceive the American people has ended.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:A lawsuit has been filed against The Wall Street Journal, its authors, corporate owners, and affiliates, including Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson, for publishing a false, malicious, and defamatory article. This legal action is presented as being on behalf of the President and all Americans to address perceived wrongdoings of the media, following previous actions against other media entities.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A lawsuit has been filed against The Wall Street Journal and individuals associated with it.
- The lawsuit targets a specific article, characterizing it as false, malicious, and defamatory.
- The legal action names the so-called authors, The Wall Street Journal, its corporate owners and affiliates, with Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson explicitly mentioned.
- The lawsuit is brought on behalf of the President and all Americans who do not tolerate perceived media abuses.
- Previous legal actions were taken against ABC, George Stephanopoulos, CBS, 60 Minutes, and The Fake Pulitzer Prizes for spreading lies and fraud.
- The individuals named in the lawsuit are expected to provide extensive depositions and testimonies.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:President Donald J. Trump states he directly warned The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch not to print a letter attributed to him regarding Epstein, asserting it was fake and threatening a lawsuit if published. He reports that despite these warnings, including one to editor Emma Tucker, the publication proceeded with what he describes as a false, malicious, and defamatory story. President Trump announces he will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Rupert Murdoch, emphasizing the need for the press to be truthful and claiming he has previously prevailed against other media outlets. He labels The Wall Street Journal a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag' and claims the story is 'FAKE NEWS,' suggesting any truth related to him and the 'Epstein Hoax' would have surfaced years ago, implying its recent appearance confirms its falsity.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch were directly warned by President Trump that a supposed letter they printed from him to Epstein was a fake.
- Mr. Murdoch indicated he would address the issue but failed to do so.
- Editor Emma Tucker was directly informed by Karoline Leavitt and President Trump that the letter was fake but chose to ignore this information.
- The Wall Street Journal published a false, malicious, and defamatory story despite warnings.
- President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Rupert Murdoch.
- The press must learn to be truthful and not rely on potentially non-existent sources.
- President Trump has previously won against George Stephanopoulos/ABC and 60 Minutes/CBS.
- The Wall Street Journal has become a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag' that publishes defamatory lies out of desperation.
- If any truth existed concerning the 'Epstein Hoax' as it pertains to President Trump, it would have been revealed years ago by figures like Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other 'Radical Left Lunatics.'
- The timing of the information's release, only after President Trump won 'three Elections,' indicates it is 'FAKE NEWS.'
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »