Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: Paramount | Clear Filter
Summary:The post criticizes Marjorie Taylor Greene, claiming her views changed because she was jilted by the President and labeling her 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA.' It also criticizes Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for an interview and past reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop, demanding an apology for 'incorrect and Libelous statements'.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Marjorie Taylor Greene (Marjorie “Traitor” Brown) went 'BAD' because she was 'JILTED by the President of the United States'.
- Marjorie Taylor Greene's ideas are now 'really BAD' and she is 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA'.
- Lesley Stahl 'attacked' the President on a past show and 'still owes' an apology.
- Lesley Stahl incorrectly stated that Hunter Biden’s 'LAPTOP FROM HELL was produced by Russia'.
- The new ownership of 60 Minutes, Paramount, is no better than the old ownership and allows bad shows to air.
- The old ownership of 60 Minutes paid the President millions for 'FAKE REPORTING'.
- 60 Minutes has gotten 'WORSE' since Paramount bought it.
- The President demands a complete and total apology from Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for 'incorrect and Libelous statements about Hunter’s Laptop'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:A $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit has been brought against The New York Times, which is characterized as a degenerate newspaper and a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democrat Party. The post asserts that The New York Times has engaged in decades of lying about the former President, his family, business, and the America First movement, and that its front-page endorsement of Kamala Harris was an illegal campaign contribution. The action builds on past successful litigation against other media entities, alleging a malicious pattern of document and visual alteration for smearing.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A $15 billion defamation and libel lawsuit is being brought against The New York Times.
- The New York Times is described as degenerate and a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democrat Party.
- The New York Times' endorsement of Kamala Harris on its front page is an unprecedented and illegal campaign contribution.
- The New York Times has engaged in a decades-long method of lying about Donald Trump, his family, business, and political movements.
- The New York Times is accused of a malicious form of defamation through a highly sophisticated system of document and visual alteration.
- Past successful litigation against George Stephanopoulos/ABC/Disney and 60 Minutes/CBS/Paramount for similar actions resulted in record settlements.
- The long-term intent and pattern of abuse by media entities is unacceptable and illegal.
- The lawsuit is being brought in Florida.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:A significant legal victory was achieved against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount, resulting in a multi-million dollar settlement. This is presented as part of a series of successes against media entities accused of widespread fraud and deceit, placing other major news outlets on notice.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A major legal victory was secured against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount.
- The settlement includes $16 million in direct payment and an anticipated $20 million more in advertising or programming, totaling over $36 million.
- CBS and its corporate owners, similar to ABC and George Slopadopoulos, were aware they had defrauded the American people and were eager to settle.
- This win is part of a continuing series of victories over the 'Fake News Media'.
- All major mainstream media outlets are now on notice that their ability to deceive the American people has ended.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »