Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: Elon Musk | Clear Filter
Summary:The post describes Elon Musk's recent decline, his interest in forming a third political party, and the author's critical view of such parties, contrasting them with the Republican party's legislative achievements, including the elimination of an Electric Vehicle mandate. It also reveals past interactions with Musk regarding his endorsement and a request for a NASA appointment.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Elon Musk is experiencing a significant decline, described as 'going completely off the rails' and becoming a 'TRAIN WRECK' over the past five weeks.
- Elon Musk intends to start a Third Political Party.
- Third Political Parties have never succeeded in the United States because 'The System seems not designed for them'.
- Third Political Parties cause 'Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS'.
- The United States already has enough disruption and chaos from the 'Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds!'.
- Republicans are a 'smooth running “machine”' and recently passed the 'biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country'.
- The Republican-passed Bill eliminates the 'ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate'.
- The EV Mandate would have 'forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time'.
- The author has been strongly opposed to the EV Mandate 'from the very beginning'.
- People are now permitted to purchase whatever type of vehicle they desire, including Gasoline Powered, Hybrids, or New Technologies.
- The author campaigned on terminating the EV Mandate for two years.
- Elon Musk provided his 'total and unquestioned Endorsement' to the author.
- The author questioned Elon Musk during his endorsement about his awareness of the plan to terminate the EV Mandate, as it was in every speech and conversation.
- Elon Musk responded that he had 'no problems' with the termination of the EV Mandate.
- Elon Musk requested that one of his close friends run NASA.
- Elon Musk's friend was a 'blue blooded Democrat' who had 'never contributed to a Republican before'.
- It was considered inappropriate for a close friend of Elon Musk, who is involved in the Space Business, to run NASA given NASA's significant role in Elon Musk's corporate life.
- The author's 'Number One charge is to protect the American Public!'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):3/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:2/10
Summary:The post asserts the author's consistent opposition to the EV Mandate, describing it as ridiculous and a major campaign issue. It claims Elon Musk receives substantial subsidies, without which his enterprises would fail and he would return to South Africa, advocating that ending these subsidies would save the country a fortune and suggesting DOGE investigate this matter for potential savings.
Sentiment:Policy-critical
Key Claims:
- Elon Musk was aware of the author's strong opposition to the EV Mandate before endorsing the author for President.
- The EV Mandate is ridiculous and has always been a major part of the author's campaign.
- Electric cars are acceptable, but forced ownership is not.
- Elon Musk receives more subsidies than any other human being.
- Without subsidies, Elon Musk's ventures, including Rocket launches, Satellites, and Electric Car Production, would cease, and he would likely return to South Africa.
- Ending these subsidies would save 'Our Country' a significant fortune.
- DOGE should thoroughly examine the situation regarding these subsidies.
- Significant financial savings are possible.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):5/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:1/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:5/10
Summary:The post asserts a proposed 'Bill' is one of the greatest legislative efforts, featuring record expense cuts of $1.6 trillion and the largest ever tax cut. It warns of a 68% tax increase and worse consequences if the bill fails, disavows responsibility for current problems, positions the author as a 'fixer,' and aims to set the country on a path to greatness. It also mentions Elon Musk's opposition.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Elon Musk has turned against the author.
- The presented 'Bill' is one of the greatest ever presented to Congress.
- The 'Bill' includes a record $1.6 Trillion cut in expenses.
- The 'Bill' delivers the biggest tax cut ever.
- Failure to pass the 'Bill' will result in a 68% tax increase.
- Failure to pass the 'Bill' will lead to 'things far worse'.
- The author did not create the current 'mess'.
- The author is present to 'FIX IT'.
- The 'Bill' puts the country on a path of greatness.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):6/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:4/10
Summary:Elon Musk states his tenure as a Special Government Employee is concluding, expressing gratitude to President Donald Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending, and asserts that the DOGE mission will integrate into government operations over time.
Sentiment:Appreciative and Prophetic
Key Claims:
- Elon Musk's scheduled time as a Special Government Employee is coming to an end.
- Elon Musk thanks President Donald Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending.
- The DOGE mission will strengthen over time.
- The DOGE mission will become a way of life throughout the government.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:9/10
Summary:The post shows Donald Trump interacting with Elon Musk, Ted Cruz, and Ari Emanuel at a public event, identified by UFC lanyards and a large audience, visually capturing a moment of public association among these figures.
Sentiment:Public Engagement
Key Claims:
- Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Ted Cruz, and Ari Emanuel were present together at a public event.
- The individuals in the image are seen interacting with each other.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »