Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: NBC News | Clear Filter
Summary:The post critiques Raphael Warnock for using religion to create division and describes media outlets such as NBC News and ABC News as biased, asserting they should be licensed and pay for their use of public airwaves.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Raphael Warnock used religion to try and divide the Country.
- Meet the Press with Kristen Welker was one-sided and very biased.
- If a Republican, particularly the author, made similar statements, it would be front-page news.
- The separation of Church and State is a relevant consideration, though it has not personally bothered the author.
- Raphael Warnock is a lightweight and a bad guy.
- Raphael Warnock's wife correctly stated that he tried to run her over with a car, almost causing her to lose her foot.
- NBC News and ABC News are among the worst networks and should be ashamed for allowing 'garbage interviews' with untalented and uncaring people.
- Media networks use public airwaves at no charge and should be properly licensed, paying significant amounts of money for their use.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post asserts that Obama administration officials, including Barack Obama, John Brennan, and James Comey, orchestrated the "Russia Hoax" following Donald Trump's 2016 election victory by suppressing intelligence that contradicted the narrative, holding a "secret Russia meeting" to plan the hoax, initiating a new assessment to claim the election was "hacked," using media outlets to spread "fake news" about Russian interference, and creating a "fake weaponized assessment" that ignored prior intelligence about Russia's lack of intent or capability.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- A "Real Intel Assessment" determined that Russia and criminal actors did not impact the 2016 U.S. election results by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure.
- An Intelligence Community (IC) briefing product that contradicted the 'Russia Hoax' narrative was pulled on December 8.
- Obama officials, including Barack Obama, John Brennan, and James Comey, held a "secret Russia meeting" on December 9 to plan the "Russia Hoax."
- An Obama order on December 9 initiated a new intelligence assessment to claim the election was 'hacked.'
- Obama officials, characterized as 'Deep State,' used their 'media propaganda arm' to spread 'fake news.'
- The Washington Post, The New York Times, and NBC News published reports asserting Russian involvement in the U.S. election or aiding Trump.
- A 'Fake Weaponized Assessment' was produced, which suppressed prior intelligence indicating Russia lacked the intent and capability to 'hack' the 2016 election.
- These actions culminated in the creation of the 'Russia Hoax.'
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:NATO allies have agreed to increase their annual defense spending to 5% of their GDP, a commitment presented as a direct result of President Trump's influence and American leadership, leading to a substantial increase in defense investment by 2035.
Sentiment:Triumphant
Key Claims:
- NATO Allies have agreed to invest 5% of their GDP annually in defense.
- This commitment is a response to significant threats to security.
- President Trump called on NATO members to boost their defense spending to 5 percent, and they agreed.
- American leadership is back on the world stage.
- President Trump convinced all of NATO to increase their defense spending by billions, to 5% of GDP annually.
- This is a massive victory and a huge development.
- NATO allies will now be spending an extra $700 billion on their own defense.
- The U.S. will no longer be taken advantage of.
- Only Trump could accomplish this.
- NATO allies have committed to invest 5 percent of GDP annually on defense by 2035.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):3/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:4/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »