Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: Ronald Reagan | Clear Filter
Summary:Donald Trump is depicted engaged in a discussion with two individuals within an ornate room featuring a portrait of Ronald Reagan.
Sentiment:Official Engagement
Key Claims:
- Donald Trump is engaged in a discussion or meeting.
- The setting is a formal, opulent room, characterized by golden decor and a prominent portrait of Ronald Reagan.
- Two other individuals are present and interacting with Donald Trump.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:Canada was caught running a fraudulent advertisement on Ronald Reagan's speech on tariffs, which the Reagan Foundation condemned for misrepresenting the former president and reviewing legal options. The post asserts that Canada's intent was to influence the United States Supreme Court regarding tariffs that have harmed the U.S. It further states that Reagan supported tariffs for national security and economic reasons, contradicting Canada's ad, and that Canada ignored demands to remove the advertisement, letting it run during the World Series. Due to this misrepresentation and hostile act, the tariff on Canada is being increased by an additional 10%.
Sentiment:Punitive
Key Claims:
- Canada was caught putting up a fraudulent advertisement on Ronald Reagan’s Speech on Tariffs.
- The Reagan Foundation stated that Canada's ad used selective, edited audio and video of President Ronald Reagan without permission and misrepresented his remarks.
- The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute is reviewing its legal options regarding the ad.
- The sole purpose of Canada's advertisement was to influence the United States Supreme Court on tariffs.
- Canada has used tariffs for years to hurt the United States.
- The United States is now able to defend itself against high Canadian tariffs and those from the rest of the World.
- Ronald Reagan supported tariffs for purposes of National Security and the Economy.
- Canada claimed Ronald Reagan did not support tariffs, which is false.
- Canada's advertisement was instructed to be taken down immediately but was allowed to run during the World Series.
- Canada's actions constitute a serious misrepresentation of facts and a hostile act.
- The tariff on Canada is being increased by an additional 10% over and above what they are currently paying.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:4/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:7/10
Summary:Canada engaged in fraudulent activity by publishing an advertisement misrepresenting Ronald Reagan's views on tariffs, with the intention of illegally influencing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. Canada has a history of imposing high tariffs on U.S. farmers, but the U.S. will no longer tolerate being exploited. The Ronald Reagan Foundation exposed this deception.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Canada fraudulently published an advertisement claiming Ronald Reagan disliked tariffs.
- Ronald Reagan supported tariffs for U.S. national security.
- Canada is attempting to illegally influence the U.S. Supreme Court regarding an important ruling.
- Canada has historically charged U.S. farmers tariffs as high as 400%.
- The U.S. will no longer be exploited by Canada and other countries through unfair tariffs.
- The Ronald Reagan Foundation exposed Canada's fraudulent advertisement.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):4/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:4/10
Summary:Donald Trump states that Canada fraudulently used a $75,000,000 fake advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs to interfere with U.S. court decisions. He declares that tariffs are vital for U.S. national security and economy, and, due to this behavior, all trade negotiations with Canada are terminated. The accompanying image is a statement from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, confirming that the Government of Ontario, Canada, created an ad using selective audio and video from a 1987 Reagan address, misrepresenting his remarks and without permission, and that the Foundation is reviewing legal options.
Sentiment:Decisive
Key Claims:
- Canada fraudulently used a fake advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.
- The advertisement cost $75,000,000.
- The purpose of the ad was to interfere with U.S. Supreme Court and other court decisions.
- Tariffs are very important to the national security and economy of the U.S.A.
- All trade negotiations with Canada are terminated due to their egregious behavior.
- The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute confirmed that the Government of Ontario, Canada, created an ad using selective audio and video from President Ronald Reagan's 1987 'Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade' without permission, misrepresenting his remarks.
- The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute is reviewing its legal options.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:6/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:8/10
Summary:The Ronald Reagan Foundation announced Canada fraudulently used a fake advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs, for $75,000, to interfere with U.S. court decisions. Tariffs are very important to U.S. national security and economy. As a consequence of Canada's egregious behavior, all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated.
Sentiment:Retaliatory
Key Claims:
- The Ronald Reagan Foundation announced Canada fraudulently used a fake advertisement.
- The advertisement featured Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.
- The advertisement was for $75,000.
- Canada used the ad to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts.
- Tariffs are very important to the national security and economy of the U.S.A.
- Based on Canada's egregious behavior, all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):8/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:8/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:8/10
Summary:The post presents an opinion piece from the New York Post, featuring a political cartoon that strongly criticizes the Democratic Party's alleged actions concerning immigration and crime, characterizing them as 'Jim Crow on steroids.' The accompanying articles discuss the potential for a transformative 'Epic' presidency under Donald Trump, aiming to forge a new political era, and propose reshaping higher education by modeling it after Southern universities.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- A new Trump presidency is depicted as 'epic' and capable of forging a new political era.
- The Democratic Party is accused of attempting to deport its 'undocumented migrant base' and arresting the 'carjacker block,' with these actions labeled as 'Jim Crow on steroids'.
- Southern universities are presented as a superior model for higher education compared to Northeastern universities, which are described as having issues with 'wokeness,' 'anti-American,' and 'antisemitic violence'.
- The narrative claims that a Trump administration implemented policies beneficial to the US, such as border policies, tariffs, and reining in government spending.
- The narrative suggests a Trump second term would be more consequential than Ronald Reagan's presidency.
- The post implies that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies are linked to problems in government and universities.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):3/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:2/10
Summary:A newspaper article highlights a projected significant increase in real wage growth for blue-collar workers under Donald Trump's potential second term, contrasting it with declines observed during Joe Biden's administration and other past presidencies.
Sentiment:Triumphant
Key Claims:
- Blue-collar real wage growth reached almost 2% in the first five months of Donald Trump's projected second term, which would be the largest increase in 60 years.
- Joe Biden's administration saw a negative real wage growth of -1.7% in 2021 for blue-collar workers.
- Donald Trump's first term (2017) also showed positive real wage growth (1.3%).
- Falling inflation under Trump (projected second term) is contributing to improved blue-collar wages.
- Biden's policies, including a purported removal of 'emphasis on manufacturing' and the influx of 'illegal migrants,' put pressure on wages.
- A Trump-backed 'budget reconciliation bill' would provide relief for blue-collar workers and eliminate federal income taxes on overtime pay.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:2/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »