Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: President of the United States | Clear Filter
Summary:Donald Trump announces a future policy initiative to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year, effective January 20, 2026, to address high rates he attributes to the Biden Administration, promoting affordability and linking the effective date to a successful past administration anniversary.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- The American Public is being "ripped off" by Credit Card Companies.
- Credit Card Companies are charging interest rates of 20 to 30%, and even more.
- High credit card interest rates "festered unimpeded" during the Sleepy Joe Biden Administration.
- A one-year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10% will be implemented.
- The credit card interest rate cap will be effective January 20, 2026.
- The January 20th date coincides with the one-year anniversary of the "historic and very successful Trump Administration."
- The policy aims to improve "AFFORDABILITY!"
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):8/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:6/10
Summary:Calls for a one-year cap on credit card interest rates at 10% starting January 20, 2026, stating that current high rates 'ripped off' the American Public during the 'Sleepy Joe Biden Administration' and that the policy will ensure 'AFFORDABILITY!' The proposed effective date is noted to coincide with the one-year anniversary of the 'historic and very successful Trump Administration'.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Credit Card Companies are 'ripping off' the American Public with interest rates of 20% to 30% and more.
- High credit card interest rates 'festered unimpeded' during the 'Sleepy Joe Biden Administration'.
- A one-year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10% will be implemented, effective January 20, 2026.
- This policy will ensure 'AFFORDABILITY!'.
- The January 20th date coincides with the one-year anniversary of the 'historic and very successful Trump Administration'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):9/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:7/10
Summary:The post claims Biden ignored critical issues and destroyed affordability, while Trump has fixed past problems and is now addressing the housing market. It details a plan to use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's $200 billion cash to buy mortgage bonds, aiming to lower mortgage rates and monthly payments, thereby restoring home affordability and the American Dream.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Biden ignored the housing market.
- Biden was immersed in high crime, open borders, runaway inflation, the Afghanistan disaster, and a chaotic military.
- Trump, as President, has already fixed 'everything that was broken'.
- Trump is now giving special attention to the housing market.
- Trump's decision not to sell Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in his first term was a great decision, contrary to experts' advice.
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now worth 'many times that amount' and hold $200 billion in cash.
- Trump is instructing his representatives to buy $200 billion in mortgage bonds.
- This action will drive mortgage rates down.
- This action will drive monthly payments down.
- This action will make home ownership more affordable.
- The Biden Administration destroyed affordability.
- Trump is restoring affordability and the American Dream.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:6/10
Summary:The post criticizes Marjorie Taylor Greene, claiming her views changed because she was jilted by the President and labeling her 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA.' It also criticizes Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for an interview and past reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop, demanding an apology for 'incorrect and Libelous statements'.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Marjorie Taylor Greene (Marjorie “Traitor” Brown) went 'BAD' because she was 'JILTED by the President of the United States'.
- Marjorie Taylor Greene's ideas are now 'really BAD' and she is 'not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA'.
- Lesley Stahl 'attacked' the President on a past show and 'still owes' an apology.
- Lesley Stahl incorrectly stated that Hunter Biden’s 'LAPTOP FROM HELL was produced by Russia'.
- The new ownership of 60 Minutes, Paramount, is no better than the old ownership and allows bad shows to air.
- The old ownership of 60 Minutes paid the President millions for 'FAKE REPORTING'.
- 60 Minutes has gotten 'WORSE' since Paramount bought it.
- The President demands a complete and total apology from Lesley Stahl and 60 Minutes for 'incorrect and Libelous statements about Hunter’s Laptop'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:A specific method of tariff implementation, currently under review by the United States Supreme Court, is presented as superior due to its directness, efficiency, and speed, which are deemed essential for strong national security outcomes. The President's authority to settle conflicts is highlighted as a clear right, having led to the settlement of eight wars in ten months.
Sentiment:Authoritative
Key Claims:
- The United States has other methods for charging tariffs against foreign countries.
- Many foreign countries have taken advantage of the U.S. for years.
- The current method of tariffing before the Supreme Court is more direct, less cumbersome, and faster.
- These characteristics are necessary for a strong and decisive national security result.
- Speed, power, and certainty are crucial for achieving lasting and victorious outcomes.
- The President settled 8 wars in 10 months.
- This was possible due to rights clearly given to the President of the United States.
- If countries did not believe these rights existed, they would have said so loudly and clearly.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:3/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:7/10
Summary:Declares documents signed by Autopen under Joe Biden terminated, asserts their illegality due to lack of specific presidential approval, and threatens perjury charges against Biden if he claims involvement in the Autopen process.
Sentiment:Directive
Key Claims:
- Approximately 92% of documents signed by Sleepy Joe Biden were done with an Autopen.
- Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen is hereby terminated and of no further force or effect.
- The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States.
- Radical Left Lunatics circling Biden in the Oval Office took the Presidency away from him.
- All Executive Orders and anything else not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden are hereby cancelled.
- The people who operated the Autopen did so illegally.
- Joe Biden was not involved in the Autopen process.
- If Joe Biden claims he was involved in the Autopen process, he will be brought up on charges of perjury.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):10/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:9/10
Summary:An individual shot and critically wounded two National Guardsmen, who are now hospitalized, and though the individual is also wounded, will face severe consequences. The post expresses strong support for the National Guard, Military, and Law Enforcement, affirming their greatness and solidarity from the Presidency.
Sentiment:Vindicative and Supportive
Key Claims:
- Two National Guardsmen were critically wounded in a shooting incident.
- The wounded National Guardsmen are in two separate hospitals.
- The individual responsible for the shooting is severely wounded.
- The individual responsible will pay a very steep price.
- God blesses the National Guard, Military, and Law Enforcement.
- The National Guard, Military, and Law Enforcement are 'Great People'.
- The President of the United States and everyone associated with the Office of the Presidency stands with these groups.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post displays the United States military's Oath of Enlistment, emphasizing key phrases such as the pledge to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, and the commitment to obey orders from the President and appointed officers, in accordance with military regulations and justice.
Sentiment:Directive
Key Claims:
- Military personnel commit to supporting and defending the Constitution of the United States.
- This defense is against all enemies, encompassing both foreign and domestic threats.
- Military personnel vow to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution.
- Military personnel promise to obey the orders of the President of the United States.
- Military personnel also promise to obey the orders of officers appointed over them.
- Obedience is to be conducted according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
- The Oath of Enlistment is a solemn pledge.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The President states that his first ten months in office are widely regarded as among the best in USA history, and expresses appreciation.
Sentiment:Triumphant
Key Claims:
- The first ten months of the presidency were among the best in USA history
- This assessment is shared by most people
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The President should have the authority to impose tariffs for national security purposes, similar to the power to stop all trade or license foreign countries, as tariffs are beneficial for US businesses and the current inability to tariff other countries is detrimental.
Sentiment:Policy-Advocating and Critical
Key Claims:
- The President is allowed to stop all trade with and license foreign countries, an action more onerous than a tariff, with full Congressional approval.
- The President is not allowed to impose a simple tariff on a foreign country, even for national security purposes.
- This situation deviates from the intentions of the Founders.
- It is 'ridiculous' that other countries can tariff the U.S. but the U.S. cannot tariff them, which is seen as a 'dream' for other countries.
- Businesses are investing in the USA specifically because of tariffs.
- The United States Supreme Court appears to be unaware of these economic realities.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):5/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:3/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:6/10