Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: TRUMP | Clear Filter
Summary:The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board's negative stance on Trump and the administration's tariff policy stems from their alleged China-centric or globalist views, which prioritize other nations' economic success over that of the United States. Tariffs are presented as essential for U.S. economic defense, claiming they bring hundreds of billions of dollars into the country at an unprecedented rate. The post asserts that corrupt, radical left judges pose the primary threat to the nation.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is negative on Trump and tariffs due to being China-centric or globalist.
- The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board prefers China and the world to "WIN, BABY, WIN."
- Tariffs are bringing hundreds of billions of dollars into the U.S. at an unprecedented rate.
- The United States would be economically defenseless without the ability to charge tariffs.
- Crooked, Radical Left Judges are the only entity capable of destroying the United States.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):4/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:5/10
Summary:Gayle King’s career has concluded due to a perceived lack of courage to support Trump, attributed to her lack of talent, low ratings, and weakness, with her show's struggles linked to "woke" programming and "left-wing bias".
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Gayle King's career is over.
- Gayle King should have maintained her belief in Trump.
- Gayle King lacked the courage to support Trump.
- Gayle King possesses no talent.
- Gayle King's show has no ratings.
- Gayle King lacks strength.
- Gayle King's show's struggles are linked to "woke" programming and "left-wing bias".
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post reports significant casualty figures for Russian and Ukrainian soldiers, and Ukrainian civilians, in the ongoing conflict, assigns responsibility for the war to the Biden administration, and states the author's intent to end it.
Sentiment:Campaigning
Key Claims:
- Almost 20,000 Russian soldiers died this month.
- Russia has lost 112,500 soldiers since the beginning of the year.
- Ukraine has lost approximately 8,000 soldiers since January 1, 2025, not including their missing.
- Ukraine has also lost civilians, in smaller numbers, due to Russian rockets in Kyiv and other Ukrainian locales.
- The war should have never happened.
- The war is attributed to Biden, not TRUMP.
- The author intends to stop the war.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):5/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:1/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:6/10
Summary:The post asserts that border crossings would be zero under Trump, contrasting with 60,000 under Joe Biden, whom it claims lost the 2020 Presidential Election by a 'LANDSLIDE' due to 'total FRAUD' and 'MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING' evidence. It calls for a Special Prosecutor to prevent future occurrences and criticizes Biden and his 'CORRUPT CRONIES' for their alleged detrimental impact on the country, concluding with 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'.
Sentiment:Angry
Key Claims:
- Zero border crossings for the month under Trump's implied leadership.
- 60,000 border crossings under Joe Biden.
- Joe Biden lost the 2020 Presidential Election.
- The 2020 election was a 'total FRAUD'.
- There is 'MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING' evidence of 2020 election fraud.
- Joe Biden is 'grossly incompetent'.
- A Special Prosecutor must be appointed.
- What Joe Biden and his 'CORRUPT CRONIES' have done to the country is 'grossly indescribable'.
- Call to 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
« Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next »