Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
- NATO has, for two decades, instructed Denmark to address a Russian threat to Greenland.
- Denmark has been unable to take effective action regarding this threat.
- The appropriate time for addressing this issue has now arrived.
- President Trump asserts that the necessary action will be completed.
- The United States has subsidized Denmark and other European Union countries for many years without remuneration.
- It is time for Denmark to reciprocate, as world peace is at stake.
- China and Russia desire Greenland, and Denmark lacks the means to protect it.
- Only the United States of America, under President Donald J. Trump, can effectively manage this situation.
- The national security of the United States and the world is dependent on this matter.
- Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have traveled to Greenland for unknown purposes, creating a very dangerous situation for global safety, security, and survival.
- These countries' actions have introduced an untenable and unsustainable level of risk.
- Strong measures must be taken to end this perilous situation quickly to protect global peace and security.
- A 10% tariff will be applied to all goods sent to the United States from the aforementioned European countries starting February 1, 2026.
- The tariff will increase to 25% on June 1, 2026.
- These tariffs will be in effect until a deal for the complete and total purchase of Greenland by the United States is finalized.
- The United States has pursued the purchase of Greenland for over 150 years, with previous attempts by many presidents being refused by Denmark.
- The acquisition of Greenland is now especially important due to "The Golden Dome" and modern offensive and defensive weapon systems.
- The "Golden Dome" system, which cost hundreds of billions of dollars and includes protection for Canada, requires Greenland for its maximum potential and efficiency due to geographic considerations.
- The United States is immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of the involved countries, despite their perceived risky actions.
- NATO is instructed to tell Denmark to remove 'them' (an unspecified presence or influence) from 'here' (implied Greenland/Arctic) immediately.
- Denmark's current defense capabilities, characterized as 'Two dogsleds', are insufficient to address the situation.
- Only the USA possesses the necessary power or capability to resolve the situation.
- Danish intelligence previously issued warnings regarding Russian and Chinese military objectives toward Greenland and the Arctic.
- The United Nations Security Council voted to acknowledge and endorse the 'BOARD OF PEACE' just moments ago.
- The 'BOARD OF PEACE' will be chaired by Donald Trump.
- The 'BOARD OF PEACE' will include the most powerful and respected Leaders throughout the World.
- This vote will go down as one of the biggest approvals in the History of the United Nations.
- This initiative will lead to further Peace all over the World.
- This moment is of true Historic proportion.
- Specific countries on the U.N. Security Council are thanked for their participation.
- Countries not on the Committee but strongly backing the effort are also thanked.
- Members of the Board and more exciting announcements will be made in the coming weeks.
- The United States spends almost $1 trillion on defense annually.
- The U.S. defense expenditure is 3.38% of its GDP.
- Trump demands NATO allies boost their defense spending to 5% of GDP.
- Trump threatens to stop protecting allies who do not commit to spending 5% of GDP on defense.
- NATO's current agreed target for defense spending is 2% of GDP.
- Mark Rutte, NATO chief, proposes raising spending to 3.5% of GDP and an additional 1.5% for wider security.
- Spain threatens to derail the NATO summit due to resistance to Trump's 5% demand.
- Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez states a 5% defense spending goal would be incompatible with Spain's welfare state.
