Stay informed on the latest Truth Social posts from Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump) without the doomscrolling. Consider it a public service for your mental health. (Why?)
Filtering by entity: Obama | Clear Filter
Summary:The number of civilian nominees confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent has significantly declined across successive presidential administrations and congresses, culminating in zero confirmations during the anticipated 119th Congress, a situation directly attributed to the Democrats.
Sentiment:Critical/Accusatory
Key Claims:
- Civilian nominee confirmations via voice vote or unanimous consent have decreased significantly over time.
- The 101st Congress (H.W. Bush administration) saw 817 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 103rd Congress (Clinton administration) saw 1100 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 107th Congress (W. Bush administration) saw 911 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 111th Congress (Obama administration) saw 856 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 115th Congress (Trump I administration) saw 533 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 117th Congress (Biden administration) saw 530 civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- The 119th Congress (Trump II administration) is presented as having zero civilian nominees confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent.
- Democrats are responsible for this decline in confirmations, indicating their actions are 'CRAZY'.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:Tariffs are essential for national survival, having generated trillions of dollars and preventing the destruction of the country and its military power. A radical left group of judges, in a 7-4 opinion, did not recognize this necessity, but one Obama-appointed Democrat judge voted to save the country, demonstrating courage and love for the U.S.A.
Sentiment:Vindicative-Appreciative
Key Claims:
- Tariffs have already generated trillions of dollars.
- Without tariffs, the country would be completely destroyed.
- Without tariffs, the country's military power would be instantly obliterated.
- A radical left group of judges, in a 7-4 opinion, did not care about the country's potential destruction.
- One Obama-appointed Democrat judge voted to save the country.
- This specific judge is courageous and loves and respects the U.S.A.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):7/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:7/10
Summary:President Zelenskyy of Ukraine possesses the immediate ability to end the war with Russia, with the post highlighting past events involving Obama, Crimea's acquisition without conflict 12 years prior, and Ukraine's non-entry into NATO as contributing factors.
Sentiment:Directive
Key Claims:
- President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately.
- The war's origin relates to events during the Obama administration concerning Crimea.
- Crimea was acquired 12 years ago without military engagement.
- Ukraine's non-membership in NATO is a persistent and significant factor.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):4/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:2/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:5/10
Summary:Obama directed the National Security Council to produce an intelligence assessment on Moscow's election influence, with specific instructions on the report's premise, and this assessment included deliberately false information.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Obama directed the National Security Council to create an Intelligence Assessment.
- The directive specified the assessment detail how Moscow influenced the election, not if.
- The assessment included knowingly false information.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:1/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:New information regarding an Obama-era Russiagate setup has surfaced.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- New information on an Obama-Russiagate setup has surfaced.
- An 'Obama-Russiagate setup' occurred.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post asserts that Democrats are obstructing the confirmation of presidential nominees, leading to historically low approval rates for current and future administrations, including a depicted 0% confirmation rate for a future Trump administration.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Democrats are harming the Nation by obstructing presidential nominee approvals.
- Democrats are refusing to approve highly qualified nominees.
- Democrats would delay and disapprove nominees even if they were historically revered figures like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
- The current level of nominee obstruction by Democrats is unprecedented.
- The graphic shows a trend of declining civilian nominee confirmation rates by voice vote or unanimous consent in the first term, specifically 65% for Trump I, 57% for Biden, and 0% for Trump II.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post quotes Mark Levin's assertion that a situation constitutes a massive scandal involving Obama.
Sentiment:Accusatory
Key Claims:
- A massive scandal is associated with Obama.
- Mark Levin identified this situation as a massive Obama scandal.
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:1/10
Summary:The post highlights a Fox News video segment featuring Mark Levin revisiting his 2017 exposure of Obama, presenting it as a must-watch.
Sentiment:Critical
Key Claims:
- Mark Levin exposed Obama in 2017
- The video segment is a must-watch
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):0/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post details an unfavorable judicial process concerning Harvard University, alleging bias against American values and the public, and declares a future Trump Administration will appeal adverse rulings, cut federal funding to Harvard, and ensure fairness in education funding.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- An Obama-appointed judge handling Harvard cases is a "total disaster."
- The judge systematically assumed control of Harvard cases, resulting in automatic "loss" for "the People of our Country."
- Harvard, despite a $52 billion endowment, is anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and anti-America.
- Much of Harvard's funding originates from the U.S.A., disadvantaging other educational institutions.
- The judge is "Trump-hating."
- An adverse ruling will be immediately appealed and result in a win.
- The government will cease providing billions of dollars to Harvard, much of which was given without explanation.
- The Trump Administration is committed to "Fairness in Funding Education" and will achieve "VICTORY."
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):1/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:0/10
Summary:The post commends Harrison Fields and a Fox News panel for their discussion on the prosecution of Barack Obama and others described as "thugs" who have been "unequivocally exposed" for "highest level Election Fraud," and offers congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard.
Sentiment:Vindicative
Key Claims:
- Harrison Fields performed admirably on Fox News
- A Fox News panel was exceptional regarding the topic of prosecuting specific individuals
- Barack Obama and other individuals referred to as 'thugs' have been unequivocally exposed
- The exposure pertains to 'highest level Election Fraud'
- Individuals identified as 'thugs' are subject to prosecution
- Tulsi Gabbard is extended congratulations
Potential Market Impact (S&P 500):2/10
Potential Geopolitical Risk:0/10
Potential Global Cross-Asset Impact:2/10